Links & Contents 1 Liked 266

Hi all,

Welcome to this week's link review!

Development news: Aid agencies & holes; WFP's information treatment problem; sexual harassment inward the UN; the World Bank's 'Doing Business' ranking disaster; New Hollywood movie-old stereotypes; Africa & China-a complicated storey of globalizations.

Our digital lives: The collaborative economic scheme inward 2018; wellbeing & woman mortal leadership; automation & racial inequalities.

Publications: New majority on DigitalID for #globaldev; Fredoom Fund, women & girls.

Academia: Revisiting academic mega-conferences; scientific discipline publishers turning into information platforms.

Enjoy!

New from aidnography
Blaming the victim(s)? Is it the assistance industry’s mistake when places are labeled ‘holes’?

As imperfect equally the offerings of the assistance manufacture are, blaming them for a changing political climate where ‘holes’ locomote a theme for word seems unfair. Public together with political perceptions are oft rooted inward long-term myths together with short-term political word or hence ‘fixing’ a problem, a pose down or a complex number similar migration. At the same fourth dimension the assistance manufacture has locomote to a greater extent than self-reflective together with self-critical together with nuanced campaigns together with advocacy past times far outnumber alarmist stories or the denigration of people together with places equally a fundraising strategy.

Development news
If you lot desire to a greater extent than various conferences & panels, brand technology utilisation of your variety strategy). I mean value Jason could bring mentioned the political economic scheme of such events-they are slowly to organize together with an slowly source of income for associations whose value inward the 21st century needs to hold out challenged to a greater extent than comprehensively.

conferences equally neoliberal commodities.

Richard Smith: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Big Brother time to come for scientific discipline publishing?

But the leaders of Elsevier bring instantly decided that the epoch of journals volition shortly hold out over. They are non buying or starting journals. They instantly depict the companionship equally a “global information analytics occupation organization that helps institutions together with professionals progress science, advance healthcare, together with ameliorate performance.” They are a “big information company.” Instead of buying journals they instantly purchase software that scientists volition need. They have, for example, bought Mendeley, “a gratis reference managing director together with an academic social network.”
The companionship recognises that scientific discipline publishing volition locomote a service that scientists volition largely run themselves. In a sense, it ever has been amongst scientists producing the science, editing the journals, peer reviewing the studies, together with and then reading the journals. But innovations similar F1000Research together with Wellcome Open Research bring shown how the services tin hold out provided much to a greater extent than cheaply—in utilisation past times dispensing amongst editors who brand (often arbitrary together with wrong) decisions on what’s of import together with what is not. Elsevier bring recognised the importance of this tendency together with are creating their ain software platforms to speed upwards together with brand cheaper the procedure of publishing science.

Richard Smith for bmj. The irony that subsequently all their critical thinking together with writing academics may hold out enslaved past times information together with algorithms-the ultimate neoliberal win of 'impact' over everything...