Rising Standards
Getting a PhD has ever rested on the same essay ... tin y'all demonstrate that you've made a contribution (see other postings on this theme). As fourth dimension passes, too to a greater extent than PhDs exceed into earth domain, it could endure argued that this are getting tougher inwards that at that spot is less past times means of unexplored "white space" out there. Two articles from the Academy of Management stable of journals render or then interesting insights on this issue. The outset is from the Academy of Management Review (AMR) which is perchance the management field's premier theory journal. The editors offering or then examples, drawn from past times editions of the journal, of how to construct theory past times reviewing the literature. They pull this every bit "review-centric" interrogation ... every bit y'all operate toward a concluding version of your ain literature review, I would recommend having a hold off at what they say.
The bit article comes from Academy of Management Learning too Education (AMLE) too it provides sobering show of increased contest inwards the academic world. Journal editors, only similar PhD examiners, brand accept/reject decisions based on the contribution offered inwards a paper. In the academic world, published papers are the building blocks from which careers too tenure are built (again see before posts on academic careers). Using information from 1988-2008, the authors of this AMLE newspaper exhibit that at that spot are to a greater extent than to a greater extent authors competing for the same publication space. Over that fourth dimension frame or then journals stimulate got increased the number of issues published per year, but fifty-fifty controlling for the number of newspaper slots available inwards top-tier journals, the show is fairly compelling. The hateful fourth dimension to reach 10 publications has grown from half-dozen years inwards 1988 to over fifteen years past times 2008. Getting accepted inwards a top-tier periodical is getting tougher. Against this somewhat depressing backdrop, it is fifty-fifty to a greater extent than of import to endure clear most 2 things inwards the early on stages of your academic career. First, endure clear most the contribution that your PhD is going to brand ... this volition surely help y'all exceed alongside minimum trauma. Second, purpose every chance to larn to intend similar a reviewer or editor. Most top-tier journals position out "notes from the editors" periodically too these offering a non bad gamble to see how the editors brand feel of their job. Also, most of the big conferences characteristic "meet the editors" sessions too of assort conferences offering the gamble for y'all to acquire involved inwards the review procedure yourself every bit a volunteer. Reviewing the operate of others is perchance the best means to sharpen your ain arguments.
The bit article comes from Academy of Management Learning too Education (AMLE) too it provides sobering show of increased contest inwards the academic world. Journal editors, only similar PhD examiners, brand accept/reject decisions based on the contribution offered inwards a paper. In the academic world, published papers are the building blocks from which careers too tenure are built (again see before posts on academic careers). Using information from 1988-2008, the authors of this AMLE newspaper exhibit that at that spot are to a greater extent than to a greater extent authors competing for the same publication space. Over that fourth dimension frame or then journals stimulate got increased the number of issues published per year, but fifty-fifty controlling for the number of newspaper slots available inwards top-tier journals, the show is fairly compelling. The hateful fourth dimension to reach 10 publications has grown from half-dozen years inwards 1988 to over fifteen years past times 2008. Getting accepted inwards a top-tier periodical is getting tougher. Against this somewhat depressing backdrop, it is fifty-fifty to a greater extent than of import to endure clear most 2 things inwards the early on stages of your academic career. First, endure clear most the contribution that your PhD is going to brand ... this volition surely help y'all exceed alongside minimum trauma. Second, purpose every chance to larn to intend similar a reviewer or editor. Most top-tier journals position out "notes from the editors" periodically too these offering a non bad gamble to see how the editors brand feel of their job. Also, most of the big conferences characteristic "meet the editors" sessions too of assort conferences offering the gamble for y'all to acquire involved inwards the review procedure yourself every bit a volunteer. Reviewing the operate of others is perchance the best means to sharpen your ain arguments.
- Editors' Comments: developing novel theoretical insights from reviews of existing theory too research, AMR, 35(4), 2010, 506-509
- Trevis Certo et al (2010) Competition too Scholarly Productivity inwards Management: investigating changes inwards scholarship from 1988 to 2008, AMLE 9(4), 591-606
0 Response to "Rising Standards"
Post a Comment